Wednesday, April 21, 2010
MEETING WITH ILO SAFEWORK DIRECTOR SEIJU MACHIDA
Minister Chaumiere met with the ILO Safework Director Seiju Machida at his office on Monday 19 April, ahead of the 25th APOSHO Annual General conference which was inaugurated by the President of the Republic, Sir Aneerood Jugnauth on Tuesday 20 April.
Minister Chaumiere, who was accompanied by the Permanent Secretary MOLIRE, discussed various Health and Safety issues which can be the subject of collaboration between APOSHO and the Ministry, of which asbestos and safety at heights.
SPEECH AT APOSHO ANNUAL CONFERENCE
It gives me a great pleasure and honour to be present at the opening ceremony of the 25th Asia-Pacific Occupational Safety and Health Organization (APOSHO) conference organised by the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health Management. At the outset, I would like to extend my warmest welcome to all the resource persons and participants attending the conference and wish them a pleasant stay in our island of Mauritius. I am informed that delegates, mainly top executives and experts in the field of occupational safety and health from more than 23 countries of the Asian and Pacific regions are attending this conference.
As you are aware, the Government has approved the hosting of this important conference in Mauritius and extended its entire co-operation and necessary support for the successful conduct of this high-level conference. The holding of the APOSHO conference for a second time in Mauritius within a decade shows clearly the commitment of the Government to occupational safety and health.
Ladies and gentlemen, APOSHO is an international organization comprising non-governmental and non-profit professional organizations engaged in activities related to occupational safety and health. The objective of APOSHO is to promote mutual understanding and cooperation in matters relating to occupational safety and health among the community in the Asian and Pacific regions. APOSHO also contributes to the enhancement of occupational safety and health through the exchange of information and views among member organizations.
I am informed that the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health Management (Mauritius) is a member of APOSHO since 1994. It represents mostly safety and health professionals in Mauritius and works in close collaboration with the Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment with a view to promoting a safety culture at workplaces in Mauritius.
Ladies and gentlemen, globalisation, intense competition and technological progress, new trends in economic structures and working conditions and changes in occupational structures are leading to dramatic and rapid changes in the working environment and eventually to new emerging workplace hazards. Along with these threats we should not forget that one of the most important challenges facing mankind is the environmental threats such as global warming, climatic changes, violent cyclones, unprecedented droughts and floods which are directly or indirectly impacting on our everyday life. Food also, we should not forget, is becoming a precious commodity and needs special mobilizations of resources from governments to establish food security programmes. All these challenges result in a lot of pressure on all stakeholders within and outside the world of work, including workers, employers and also on the government.
This conference on “emerging safety, health and environment issues in a changing world” therefore comes at a most opportune time given the current situation prevailing in the world in the field of occupational safety and health and environment.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Government in Mauritius fully subscribes to the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda which is a concrete response to the present challenges. Decent work is defined as the right to productive work in conditions of freedom, equity, security and human dignity. Work can only be decent if it is safe and healthy. Mauritius has prepared a national safety and health policy since 2001 through tripartite consultation at national level. Furthermore, Government has in its programme 2005-2010 given occupational safety and health its due importance.
Within weeks after assuming office we came up with a modern, comprehensive and up-to-date legislation, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 with a view to enhancing the standards of occupational safety and health at work. This law incorporates new concepts such as safety and health policy, risk assessment and health surveillance so as to further improve safety and health standards at work. Additionally, with a view to helping employers in the proper implementation of new concepts in the law my ministry has, through tripartite consultation at the level of Advisory Council for Occupational Safety and Health, prepared guidelines on risk assessment which have been transmitted to the ILO for their views and comments.
Last year, we promulgated the Occupational Safety and Health (Electricity at Work) Regulations to further reinforce safety and health in the field of electrical safety. These Regulations include up-to-date safety standards in the field of electricity so as to better protect electrical systems and employees at work from dangers of electricity. They lay much emphasis on the duties and responsibilities of the employer to ensure the safety and health of all employees exposed to dangers arising from electricity – either directly or indirectly. They cover a wide range of activities related to electricity and are of importance to all those engaged in the design, construction, installation, use and maintenance of electrical systems.
Ladies and gentlemen, my Ministry has, with the collaboration of ILO, implemented several projects with a view to improve overall safety and health standards in Mauritius namely:
In 2007 a national tripartite workshop was held in collaboration with the ILO with a view to sensitize social partners on the ILO guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems 2001 so as to improve OSH management at national and enterprise level.
In 2009 an ILO consultant prepared a national OSH profile for Mauritius and the document was validated at a tripartite workshop held in collaboration with the ILO. The action plan proposed at the workshop is presently being finalized at the level of the Advisory Council for Occupational Safety and Health.
This year again, with the help of the ILO, a tripartite workshop was held on risk assessment so that the social partners are sensitized on the concept of risk assessment.
Ladies and gentlemen I wish to inform you that Mauritius is already a signatory of the Seoul Declaration on Safety and Health at Work of 2008 and the Government is taking appropriate measures to ensure the promotion of a high level of safety and health at workplaces and for the building and maintenance of a national preventative safety and health culture.
With these words, ladies and gentlemen, I wish you fruitful deliberation for the conference and a pleasant stay in our island.
Friday, April 16, 2010
“EMPLOYMENT WILL REMAIN ONE OF THE PRIORITIES OF THE NEXT GOVERNMENT”, MINISTER CHAUMIÈRE SAYS.
The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, Hon. Jean-François Chaumière met with the new resident representative on the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (Foundation) – FES – at his office in Port Louis on Thursday 15 April. Constatin Grund, who will be leading the FES representation from Madagascar, is replacing Oliver Dalichau who will be starting a new term in Angola. The FES has a 30-year working relationship in Mauritius with different partners including Government and NGOs.
In the course of their meeting today, Hon. Minister Chaumière and Mr. Grund reviewed the different projects that had been conducted under the aegis of the foundation and with organizations such as Labour Watch. The current political ambiance in Mauritius was also commented. Minister Chaumière praised the democratic, free and fair electoral system in Mauritius and the respect which all political parties have for the Electoral Commission and its different agencies. Mr. Grund commented on the situation in Mauritius and in Madagascar, where he will be based for the next 3 years, highlighting the respect shown in Mauritius for the political process.
Both parties also spoke of the new areas of collaboration between Government, the FES and NGOs, of which the promotion of the Decent Work agenda. For reminder, the FES is one of Germany’s oldest party-associated organizations aiming to promote, inter alia, social democracy, workers’ rights and the free press.
Monday, April 12, 2010
SPEECH - HON. CHAUMIERE AT THE 48TH MEF AGM
I am indeed very pleased to be amongst you today on the occasion of the 48th Annual General Meeting of the Mauritius Employers’ Federation. Allow me to thank the Chairman and the Director of MEF for associating me with this important event.
Your Annual General Meeting obviously constitutes an important occasion to take stock of achievements and to discuss the way forward.
Ladies and gentlemen, I still recall that at this assembly last year, I spoke of the difficult times which our country was going through in the wake of the international economic and financial crisis and the many important issues which required to be addressed by all of us. I spoke of the challenge of not only achieving our objective of job creation, but also and more importantly of preserving and protecting workers.
I referred to the Stimulus Package and highlighted its social contract nature and the obligations of all concerned. I called on you to help advance the Decent Work Agenda in Mauritius and urged you to see to it that there is full compliance with the new labour laws, namely the Employment Relations Act and the Employment Rights Act.
Indeed, this assembly today provides us all with the opportunity not only to discuss achievements and actions in relation to these issues but also to brace ourselves for future challenges.
Let me first thank the MEF for the way it has responded to Government’s call to harness all efforts and resources with a view to address the impact of the international economic and financial crisis. Indeed, we have been able to come out relatively unscathed through the economic crisis, thanks to the measures initiated by Government and through our concerted efforts.
Today most of the economic and social indicators show that Government was right in coming up with timely, bold and enabling measures. Thanks to the Additional Stimulus Package and to a host of other budgetary measures and schemes implemented, we have been able to save thousands of jobs – contrary to the prediction made in some quarters of massive job losses due to the economic crisis.
Ladies and gentlemen, it should be noted that the measures we have implemented through the Additional Stimulus Package along with some of the measures provided in the new labour laws, in particular the Workfare Programme, are in line with recommendations contained in the ILO Global Jobs Pact, adopted at the 98th Session of the International Labour Conference. The ILO Global Jobs Pact underlines key economic, labour and social policy measures to face the crisis and help the transition to recovery. These policy measures which have been recommended by the ILO, and which are being implemented by Government include the following:- unemployment benefits, re-skilling of redundant workers, public investment in infrastructure and housing, support to SMEs, enhancement of social protection to vulnerable groups and social dialogue.
You would certainly agree with me that these measures which we have implemented have contributed to making our economy more resistant to the impact of the global crisis and more resilient. Given the success of these measures, Government has deemed it appropriate to respond positively to the request of employers to maintain the Additional Stimulus Package until December this year.
Our concerted actions to steer Mauritius through and out of the crisis have resulted in our country being commended by numerous countries and international organisations and financial institutions like the IMF and the World Bank.
Ladies and gentlemen, in so far as the employment situation is concerned, let me say that Mauritius has done fairly well – despite the economic crisis. Contrary to what is happening worldwide, be it in the USA, in Europe or in the emerging economies like China and India, we have, in Mauritius, not only succeeded in protecting jobs, but we have also been able to create additional jobs despite the difficult context.
During the year 2009, employment in Mauritius increased by 5,800, while the unemployment rate rose from 7.2% in 2008 to 7.3% in 2009, which represents an increase of 1,100 additional unemployed, a reasonable figure indeed, in the circumstances.
Ladies and gentlemen, since the coming into force of the Employment Rights Act in February 2009 up to last week, some 2,300 laid-off workers have registered under the Workfare Programme. The Workfare Programme has brought a form of immediate financial assistance to workers laid-off essentially as a result of the re-structuring of their enterprises. We should bear in mind however, that the Workfare Programme has to be sustained financially. It has been noted that some employers have still not paid the recycling fee in respect of laid-off workers within the prescribed time limit. I take this opportunity therefore, to request employers to honour their obligation under the law.
I have also noted with concern that, in many cases, workers aged 40 and above are the first to be laid-off during downsizing of an enterprise, this despite their considerable work experience and skills and their demonstrated loyalty to the enterprise. Another factor of concern is the perceived reluctance on the part of some enterprises where vacancies exist to recruit such workers who are referred to them for placement by the Employment Service of my Ministry. We should not forget that these middle-aged workers have family responsibilities and financial commitments. More often than not, their contribution to the financial upkeep of their families is crucial, particularly with regard to the education of their children, housing loan repayments etc. The reluctance shown by some employers to recruit such workers is prejudicial to them on a number of counts.
I have no doubt that you are all conscious of what a tragedy it is for a middle-aged worker, who has spent his best years and energy working for the success of an enterprise to ultimately find himself redundant with little hope of an early placement in another similar job.
I therefore make an appeal to enterprises through the MEF to exercise due care and consideration and a humane approach whenever they have to proceed with laying-off. However, I need not remind you that the laying-off of workers by enterprises facing difficulties should be a decision of last resort. There are other measures and schemes available to such enterprises to assist them without their having recourse to lay-off.
Ladies and gentlemen, recent events with regard to the world of work and industrial relations in the country prompt me today to focus on some specific issues such as collective-bargaining, freedom of association, fundamental rights of workers, discrimination and occupational safety and health, among others.
It is the duty of any civilised society to ensure that its members enjoy respect and dignity and ensures observance of their rights. We should not forget that the level of development we have attained would not have been possible without the efforts and contribution of workers of this country.
One year after the coming into effect of the new Labour laws, and despite the fact that there exist specific provisions in the law regarding the role and responsibilities of employers with regard to the promotion of collective-bargaining, I have to say that the status of collective-bargaining in the country has, unfortunately, not registered much progress. Many enterprises have yet to sign the procedure agreement with duly recognised trade unions.
The right to freedom of association is a fundamental right and I am deeply concerned whenever this right is denied by some employers – as it happened in a recent case involving a well known company in the textile sector. I therefore appeal to employers to facilitate the process of recognition where trade unions are adequately represented as per provision of the law and facilitate also the collective bargaining process where the need arises.
Ladies & Gentlemen,
Safety at work is also one of the fundamental rights of workers. As employers, you have a direct responsibility to take all steps necessary to provide a safe working environment. The Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 clearly sets out the duties and responsibilities employers with regard to safety at work. These include: -
the preparation of an occupational safety and health policy where enterprises have more than 50 employees and the implementation of same.
the carrying out regularly of a risk assessment at the workplace with a view to identifying hazards, evaluating the risks arising and taking corrective measures as necessary.
It is in the interest of every employer to ensure that due consideration is given to occupational safety and health matters as poor safety and health records negatively impact on the enterprise’ productivity and reputation. In this world of cut throat competition there is no room for complacency and appropriate action will be taken whenever cases of negligence or non-compliance are brought to light.
Ladies & Gentlemen,
My Ministry is also committed to the elimination of all forms of discrimination which may exist in our laws. To that effect, the Ministry commissioned, with financial assistance from UNDP, a study to identify all discriminatory provisions in our national legislation with respect to international instruments such as the ILO Convention No. 111 concerning Discrimination in respect of Employment and Occupation and the CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women), just to name these two.
A Committee has now been set up under the chairmanship of the Attorney-General, Hon Rama Valayden, to monitor the implementation of the recommendations of this study and ensure harmonisation of our national legislation with the provisions of these international instruments.
Before I conclude, I would like to congratulate the outgoing president of the MEF, Mr Anwar Joonas, for the catalyst role the MEF has played under his able leadership, particularly with regard to the implementation of the new labour laws. His mandate was also marked by the international economic and financial crisis and MEF has been a party to the introduction of several measures to mitigate the impact of the crisis on our economy. I have no doubt that the MEF will, under the incoming president, continue to successfully address the challenges ahead and foster good relations with all partners. I am confident that I can always rely on the full support of the MEF.
Your Annual General Meeting obviously constitutes an important occasion to take stock of achievements and to discuss the way forward.
Ladies and gentlemen, I still recall that at this assembly last year, I spoke of the difficult times which our country was going through in the wake of the international economic and financial crisis and the many important issues which required to be addressed by all of us. I spoke of the challenge of not only achieving our objective of job creation, but also and more importantly of preserving and protecting workers.
I referred to the Stimulus Package and highlighted its social contract nature and the obligations of all concerned. I called on you to help advance the Decent Work Agenda in Mauritius and urged you to see to it that there is full compliance with the new labour laws, namely the Employment Relations Act and the Employment Rights Act.
Indeed, this assembly today provides us all with the opportunity not only to discuss achievements and actions in relation to these issues but also to brace ourselves for future challenges.
Let me first thank the MEF for the way it has responded to Government’s call to harness all efforts and resources with a view to address the impact of the international economic and financial crisis. Indeed, we have been able to come out relatively unscathed through the economic crisis, thanks to the measures initiated by Government and through our concerted efforts.
Today most of the economic and social indicators show that Government was right in coming up with timely, bold and enabling measures. Thanks to the Additional Stimulus Package and to a host of other budgetary measures and schemes implemented, we have been able to save thousands of jobs – contrary to the prediction made in some quarters of massive job losses due to the economic crisis.
Ladies and gentlemen, it should be noted that the measures we have implemented through the Additional Stimulus Package along with some of the measures provided in the new labour laws, in particular the Workfare Programme, are in line with recommendations contained in the ILO Global Jobs Pact, adopted at the 98th Session of the International Labour Conference. The ILO Global Jobs Pact underlines key economic, labour and social policy measures to face the crisis and help the transition to recovery. These policy measures which have been recommended by the ILO, and which are being implemented by Government include the following:- unemployment benefits, re-skilling of redundant workers, public investment in infrastructure and housing, support to SMEs, enhancement of social protection to vulnerable groups and social dialogue.
You would certainly agree with me that these measures which we have implemented have contributed to making our economy more resistant to the impact of the global crisis and more resilient. Given the success of these measures, Government has deemed it appropriate to respond positively to the request of employers to maintain the Additional Stimulus Package until December this year.
Our concerted actions to steer Mauritius through and out of the crisis have resulted in our country being commended by numerous countries and international organisations and financial institutions like the IMF and the World Bank.
Ladies and gentlemen, in so far as the employment situation is concerned, let me say that Mauritius has done fairly well – despite the economic crisis. Contrary to what is happening worldwide, be it in the USA, in Europe or in the emerging economies like China and India, we have, in Mauritius, not only succeeded in protecting jobs, but we have also been able to create additional jobs despite the difficult context.
During the year 2009, employment in Mauritius increased by 5,800, while the unemployment rate rose from 7.2% in 2008 to 7.3% in 2009, which represents an increase of 1,100 additional unemployed, a reasonable figure indeed, in the circumstances.
Ladies and gentlemen, since the coming into force of the Employment Rights Act in February 2009 up to last week, some 2,300 laid-off workers have registered under the Workfare Programme. The Workfare Programme has brought a form of immediate financial assistance to workers laid-off essentially as a result of the re-structuring of their enterprises. We should bear in mind however, that the Workfare Programme has to be sustained financially. It has been noted that some employers have still not paid the recycling fee in respect of laid-off workers within the prescribed time limit. I take this opportunity therefore, to request employers to honour their obligation under the law.
I have also noted with concern that, in many cases, workers aged 40 and above are the first to be laid-off during downsizing of an enterprise, this despite their considerable work experience and skills and their demonstrated loyalty to the enterprise. Another factor of concern is the perceived reluctance on the part of some enterprises where vacancies exist to recruit such workers who are referred to them for placement by the Employment Service of my Ministry. We should not forget that these middle-aged workers have family responsibilities and financial commitments. More often than not, their contribution to the financial upkeep of their families is crucial, particularly with regard to the education of their children, housing loan repayments etc. The reluctance shown by some employers to recruit such workers is prejudicial to them on a number of counts.
I have no doubt that you are all conscious of what a tragedy it is for a middle-aged worker, who has spent his best years and energy working for the success of an enterprise to ultimately find himself redundant with little hope of an early placement in another similar job.
I therefore make an appeal to enterprises through the MEF to exercise due care and consideration and a humane approach whenever they have to proceed with laying-off. However, I need not remind you that the laying-off of workers by enterprises facing difficulties should be a decision of last resort. There are other measures and schemes available to such enterprises to assist them without their having recourse to lay-off.
Ladies and gentlemen, recent events with regard to the world of work and industrial relations in the country prompt me today to focus on some specific issues such as collective-bargaining, freedom of association, fundamental rights of workers, discrimination and occupational safety and health, among others.
It is the duty of any civilised society to ensure that its members enjoy respect and dignity and ensures observance of their rights. We should not forget that the level of development we have attained would not have been possible without the efforts and contribution of workers of this country.
One year after the coming into effect of the new Labour laws, and despite the fact that there exist specific provisions in the law regarding the role and responsibilities of employers with regard to the promotion of collective-bargaining, I have to say that the status of collective-bargaining in the country has, unfortunately, not registered much progress. Many enterprises have yet to sign the procedure agreement with duly recognised trade unions.
The right to freedom of association is a fundamental right and I am deeply concerned whenever this right is denied by some employers – as it happened in a recent case involving a well known company in the textile sector. I therefore appeal to employers to facilitate the process of recognition where trade unions are adequately represented as per provision of the law and facilitate also the collective bargaining process where the need arises.
Ladies & Gentlemen,
Safety at work is also one of the fundamental rights of workers. As employers, you have a direct responsibility to take all steps necessary to provide a safe working environment. The Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 clearly sets out the duties and responsibilities employers with regard to safety at work. These include: -
the preparation of an occupational safety and health policy where enterprises have more than 50 employees and the implementation of same.
the carrying out regularly of a risk assessment at the workplace with a view to identifying hazards, evaluating the risks arising and taking corrective measures as necessary.
It is in the interest of every employer to ensure that due consideration is given to occupational safety and health matters as poor safety and health records negatively impact on the enterprise’ productivity and reputation. In this world of cut throat competition there is no room for complacency and appropriate action will be taken whenever cases of negligence or non-compliance are brought to light.
Ladies & Gentlemen,
My Ministry is also committed to the elimination of all forms of discrimination which may exist in our laws. To that effect, the Ministry commissioned, with financial assistance from UNDP, a study to identify all discriminatory provisions in our national legislation with respect to international instruments such as the ILO Convention No. 111 concerning Discrimination in respect of Employment and Occupation and the CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women), just to name these two.
A Committee has now been set up under the chairmanship of the Attorney-General, Hon Rama Valayden, to monitor the implementation of the recommendations of this study and ensure harmonisation of our national legislation with the provisions of these international instruments.
Before I conclude, I would like to congratulate the outgoing president of the MEF, Mr Anwar Joonas, for the catalyst role the MEF has played under his able leadership, particularly with regard to the implementation of the new labour laws. His mandate was also marked by the international economic and financial crisis and MEF has been a party to the introduction of several measures to mitigate the impact of the crisis on our economy. I have no doubt that the MEF will, under the incoming president, continue to successfully address the challenges ahead and foster good relations with all partners. I am confident that I can always rely on the full support of the MEF.
Monday, March 29, 2010
“THE FOREST SIDE LABOUR OFFICE IS TO BE DELIVERED TO THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR BY MID-APRIL,” MINISTER CHAUMIÈRE SAYS
The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, Hon. Jean-François Chaumière held a meeting with officers from the Industrial Relations and Employment divisions of MOLIRE, the Ministry of Public Infrastructure, CWA, CEB, WWA and the building contractor in charge of the Forest Side Labour Office project today for a review of progress on what is soon to become the island’s biggest labour office.
The Minister asked all those involved in the project that he is expecting all remaining items to be completed so that the new building is handed over by mid April.
The new building, found at Célicourt Antelme Street in Forest Side, where the former Regional Labour Office also stood, is 6000 square feet in total at a cost of about Rs 14 million. It will be housing officers from the Labour and Industrial Relations Division, in charge of dealing with all work-related complaints. The Employment Division responsible for dealing with employment enquiries and placements will also be found there. Officers from the Mediation and Conciliation unit will also be present.
The current Regional Labour Office was temporarily transferred to Lees St in Curepipe at the start of works on the Forest Side building in February 2009.
Labels:
MINISTERIAL ACTIVITIES,
PRESS RELEASES
Thursday, March 25, 2010
MINISTER CHAUMIÈRE HAILS INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND HEALTH AND SAFETY MEASURES AT PRINCES TUNA MAURITIUS
The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment Hon. Jean-François Chaumière undertook a visit at Princes’ Tuna Mauritius (PTM) factory at Riche Terre, today 25th March 2010. Minister Chaumière had the opportunity to visit various plants of the factory, including the cold room, canning and packing. He also discussed with employees at different levels. Minister Chaumière was thus able to gauge the state of industrial relations in the company, as well as the various health and safety measures taken there. He was accompanied in his tour of the factory by the managing director Evert Liewes and officials of the Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment.
Today’s event was also the opportunity for Princes Tuna Mauritius to receive SA (Social Accountability) 8000 certification from SGS. The company is therefore the first tuna processing plant in the world to receive this type of certification. SA 8000 therefore demonstrates the company’s commitment to promoting the elimination of discrimination, collective bargaining and sound working conditions in general. These issues are a matter of great importance to Minister Chaumière who said so to management and employees, as he proceeded to handing over the SA 8000 certificate to PTM. In his address, Minister Chaumière highlighted the new measures incorporated in the Employment Relations and Employment Rights Acts, which seemed to have been applied by PTM in advance. He also made an appeal to employees to take their share of responsibility in maintaining optimal work conditions by making the company aware of anything they deem inadequate and by keeping to the core principle of social dialogue which has prevailed in the company for numerous years.
MD Evert Liewes and workers’ representative Lall Dewnath (Artisans and General Workers Union) also addressed the workers. They were both also keen to underline the excellent partnership that exists between the management and the workers.
Monday, March 22, 2010
MINISTER CHAUMIÈRE CALLS ON STAKEHOLDERS TO BE MORE RIGOUROUS IN APPLYING OSHA REGULATIONS
The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, Hon. Jean-François Chaumière inaugurated a tripartite workshop today on ‘Risk Assessment’. The workshop is being organized by the Ministry, with the collaboration of the International Labour Organisation (ILO).
Representatives of the private sector (from MEXA, MEF etc) as well as trade unioninsts (NTUC, GSA etc) are participating in the workshop. Resource persons during this event include Mr. Franklin Muchiri, Senior Occupational Safety and Health Specialist and Mr. Pavan Baichoo, Technical Officer, Occupational Safety, International Programme on Safety and Health at Work and the Environment, Safework, both from the ILO.
In his speech, Minister Chaumière said that: “this government has pledged to ‘put people first’ and we share the belief of the ILO that the right to life is the most fundamental right and that workers’ protection against work-related accidents and illnesses is one of their fundamental rights. That is why we have come up with such a comprehensive and modern piece of legislation on occupational safety and health.” Following the death of 33-year old Frédéric Ramkissoon by electrocution on his workplace on Saturday, Minister Chaumière made a special and pressing appeal to stakeholders: “I would like to make an appeal to MEF to further strengthen the efforts in enabling its members to comply with the provisions of OSHA 2005 and in tackling new forms of hazards.” He added he had visited the bereaved Ramkissoon family and that it was unacceptable that any human life would be lost on the workplace.
The tripartite workshop, which is being held at the Imperial China Restaurant in Trianon ends Friday 26 March.
SPEECH - TRIPARTITE WORKSHOP ON RISK ASSESSMENT
A very good morning to everyone of you. It gives me much pleasure to be amongst you, this morning, on the occasion of the opening ceremony of this ‘’ organised by the Ministry of Labour, Industrial relations and Employment in collaboration with the ILO.
I am informed that the objectives of the workshop are to train participants in the concepts and principles of occupational safety and health, risk assessment and management, hazard identification, risk assessment methodologies, hazard control and preventive measures and risk communication and reporting.
I am pleased to note that two eminent experts from the ILO, namely Mr. Franklin Muchiri, Senior Occupational Safety and Health Specialist and Mr. Pavan Baichoo, Technical Officer, Occupational Safety, International Programme on Safety and Health at Work and the Environment, Safework will be the resource persons for the workshop and let me take this opportunity to extend a special welcome to them and wish them a pleasant stay in the country.
Ladies and gentlemen, the holding of this tripartite workshop is a testimony to the continued commitment and effort of my Ministry in creating a long lasting and sustainable safety and health culture in Mauritius. This workshop goes in the right direction of providing the stakeholders with the appropriate skills, knowledge and attitude with the view of enhancing the general knowledge of safety and health at workplaces.
My Ministry is closely monitoring the compliance by employers with the provisions of the OSHA 2005 relating to safety and health policy, health surveillance and most particularly risk assessment as this is the tool that will help employers to manage risks at workplaces.
An exercise undertaken by the Ministry in October last year to find out whether enterprises are carrying out the risk assessment required under OSHA 2005 has revealed that so far 93 risk assessments have been carried out at places of work where more than 50 employees are employed.
In the light of the feedback received from employers and given that risk assessment is a new and technical concept, my Ministry has promptly reacted to the situation through:
• the preparation of Guidelines in Risk Assessment (Safety and Health) to help employers to conduct their risk assessment exercise in their enterprises. After extensive consultations at the level of the Advisory Council on OSH, draft Guidelines have been prepared and the draft document has been submitted to the ILO for its views and comments before finalization;
• enlisting ILO’s assistance for the organization of this Workshop on Risk Assessment which has been possible due to the personal initiative of Mr Muchiri to whom we are very thankful today – thank you Mr Muchiri.
Here I would also like to place on record the continued and unflinching support of ILO to the project of my Ministry.
Ladies and gentlemen, globalisation, intense competition and technological progress, new trends in economic structures and working conditions and changes in occupational structures are leading dramatic and rapid changes in the working environment and eventually to new emerging workplace hazards. All these result in a lot of pressure on all stakeholders in the world of work, including workers, employers and also on the enforcing authority. And in this context, this workshop is most welcomed as it will equip the participants with the necessary knowledge and skills for effective management of risks at workplaces.
As you are aware, risk assessment is the cornerstone of occupational safety and health. If the risk assessment process, the start of the risk management approach, is not done well or not done at all, then the appropriate preventive measures are unlikely to be in place.
Integrated risk assessment is part of a good management approach. As it takes into account the different steps of risk assessment, the different needs of individual employers, the changing world of work, and a participatory approach involving everyone in the workplace. Employers in each workplace have a moral and a legal responsibility to ensure the safety and health of workers in every aspect related to work.
It is sad to note that another tragic and fatal accident occurred on Saturday 20 March 2010. I would like to express my sympathy to the members of the family of the deceased. ‘Un accident c’est toujours un accident de trop.’ Hence, I again make an appeal to all stakeholders, in particular to the Mauritius Employers’ Federation and other employers to redouble their efforts so as to prevent recurrence of such mishaps.
The risk associated with any work activity depends on the severity of an accident or ill health that may occur, and the likelihood of its occurrence. All workplaces need to have risk assessments conducted to help identify the sources of risks, actions that should be taken, and parties responsible for doing so. A risk assessment enables effective measures to be taken to protect the safety and health of workers which include
• Preventing occupational risks,
• Providing information and training to workers, and
• Putting in place the organization and means to implement the necessary measures.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005, which came into force on 01 September 2007, prescribes specific duties for employers regarding risk assessment. Every employer is required to make a suitable and sufficient assessment of any risk to the safety and health to which any employee is exposed whilst he is at work for the purpose of identifying the measures he needs to implement in order to comply with the requirements imposed upon him by the Act. Any such assessment shall be reviewed by the employer not later than two years after any assessment or earlier where there has been a significant change in the matters to which it relates. Where an employer employs more than five persons, the significant findings of any assessment should be recorded.
Ladies and gentlemen, this government has pledged to ‘put people first’ and we share the belief of the ILO that the right to life is the most fundamental right and that workers’ protection against work-related accidents and illnesses is one of their fundamental rights. That is why we have come up with such a comprehensive and modern piece of legislation on occupational safety and health.
Furthermore it is an undeniable fact that occupational safety and health has gained much importance on the international scene over the past years. However, we should not ignore the new threats and challenges facing us. The recent financial crisis has been a factor of concern for the safety and health of workers around the world. Workers will be stressed due to the fear of losing their jobs and employers might reduce resources allocated to safety and health. These can culminate into a gloomier picture of occupational safety and health with possible increase in work accidents and work-related stress.
Before concluding, I would like to make an appeal to MEF to further strengthen the efforts in enabling its members to comply with the provisions of OSHA 2005 and in tackling new forms of hazards like stress and workplace violence.
On this note, I wish all the participants a fruitful interaction during this workshop and I have no doubt that they will make the most out of it and will benefit fully from the expertise of the two high calibre experts from the ILO.
I now have the pleasure of declaring the workshop open. I thank you for your attention.
I am informed that the objectives of the workshop are to train participants in the concepts and principles of occupational safety and health, risk assessment and management, hazard identification, risk assessment methodologies, hazard control and preventive measures and risk communication and reporting.
I am pleased to note that two eminent experts from the ILO, namely Mr. Franklin Muchiri, Senior Occupational Safety and Health Specialist and Mr. Pavan Baichoo, Technical Officer, Occupational Safety, International Programme on Safety and Health at Work and the Environment, Safework will be the resource persons for the workshop and let me take this opportunity to extend a special welcome to them and wish them a pleasant stay in the country.
Ladies and gentlemen, the holding of this tripartite workshop is a testimony to the continued commitment and effort of my Ministry in creating a long lasting and sustainable safety and health culture in Mauritius. This workshop goes in the right direction of providing the stakeholders with the appropriate skills, knowledge and attitude with the view of enhancing the general knowledge of safety and health at workplaces.
My Ministry is closely monitoring the compliance by employers with the provisions of the OSHA 2005 relating to safety and health policy, health surveillance and most particularly risk assessment as this is the tool that will help employers to manage risks at workplaces.
An exercise undertaken by the Ministry in October last year to find out whether enterprises are carrying out the risk assessment required under OSHA 2005 has revealed that so far 93 risk assessments have been carried out at places of work where more than 50 employees are employed.
In the light of the feedback received from employers and given that risk assessment is a new and technical concept, my Ministry has promptly reacted to the situation through:
• the preparation of Guidelines in Risk Assessment (Safety and Health) to help employers to conduct their risk assessment exercise in their enterprises. After extensive consultations at the level of the Advisory Council on OSH, draft Guidelines have been prepared and the draft document has been submitted to the ILO for its views and comments before finalization;
• enlisting ILO’s assistance for the organization of this Workshop on Risk Assessment which has been possible due to the personal initiative of Mr Muchiri to whom we are very thankful today – thank you Mr Muchiri.
Here I would also like to place on record the continued and unflinching support of ILO to the project of my Ministry.
Ladies and gentlemen, globalisation, intense competition and technological progress, new trends in economic structures and working conditions and changes in occupational structures are leading dramatic and rapid changes in the working environment and eventually to new emerging workplace hazards. All these result in a lot of pressure on all stakeholders in the world of work, including workers, employers and also on the enforcing authority. And in this context, this workshop is most welcomed as it will equip the participants with the necessary knowledge and skills for effective management of risks at workplaces.
As you are aware, risk assessment is the cornerstone of occupational safety and health. If the risk assessment process, the start of the risk management approach, is not done well or not done at all, then the appropriate preventive measures are unlikely to be in place.
Integrated risk assessment is part of a good management approach. As it takes into account the different steps of risk assessment, the different needs of individual employers, the changing world of work, and a participatory approach involving everyone in the workplace. Employers in each workplace have a moral and a legal responsibility to ensure the safety and health of workers in every aspect related to work.
It is sad to note that another tragic and fatal accident occurred on Saturday 20 March 2010. I would like to express my sympathy to the members of the family of the deceased. ‘Un accident c’est toujours un accident de trop.’ Hence, I again make an appeal to all stakeholders, in particular to the Mauritius Employers’ Federation and other employers to redouble their efforts so as to prevent recurrence of such mishaps.
The risk associated with any work activity depends on the severity of an accident or ill health that may occur, and the likelihood of its occurrence. All workplaces need to have risk assessments conducted to help identify the sources of risks, actions that should be taken, and parties responsible for doing so. A risk assessment enables effective measures to be taken to protect the safety and health of workers which include
• Preventing occupational risks,
• Providing information and training to workers, and
• Putting in place the organization and means to implement the necessary measures.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005, which came into force on 01 September 2007, prescribes specific duties for employers regarding risk assessment. Every employer is required to make a suitable and sufficient assessment of any risk to the safety and health to which any employee is exposed whilst he is at work for the purpose of identifying the measures he needs to implement in order to comply with the requirements imposed upon him by the Act. Any such assessment shall be reviewed by the employer not later than two years after any assessment or earlier where there has been a significant change in the matters to which it relates. Where an employer employs more than five persons, the significant findings of any assessment should be recorded.
Ladies and gentlemen, this government has pledged to ‘put people first’ and we share the belief of the ILO that the right to life is the most fundamental right and that workers’ protection against work-related accidents and illnesses is one of their fundamental rights. That is why we have come up with such a comprehensive and modern piece of legislation on occupational safety and health.
Furthermore it is an undeniable fact that occupational safety and health has gained much importance on the international scene over the past years. However, we should not ignore the new threats and challenges facing us. The recent financial crisis has been a factor of concern for the safety and health of workers around the world. Workers will be stressed due to the fear of losing their jobs and employers might reduce resources allocated to safety and health. These can culminate into a gloomier picture of occupational safety and health with possible increase in work accidents and work-related stress.
Before concluding, I would like to make an appeal to MEF to further strengthen the efforts in enabling its members to comply with the provisions of OSHA 2005 and in tackling new forms of hazards like stress and workplace violence.
On this note, I wish all the participants a fruitful interaction during this workshop and I have no doubt that they will make the most out of it and will benefit fully from the expertise of the two high calibre experts from the ILO.
I now have the pleasure of declaring the workshop open. I thank you for your attention.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
MINISTERIAL COMMITTEE ON ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION OF IN MAURTITIAN LAWS MEETS TRADE UNIONS
The 4th round of consultations on the Elimination of Discrimination in Mauritian Laws took place today at the Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment. This meeting was chaired by the Attorney General Rama Valayden, in presence of Minister Jean-François Chaumière and representatives of trade unions such as the SEF, the NTUC, the CTSP, the MLC, the FPU and the GWF.
The trade unionists were keen to present views to the Attorney General and Minister Chaumière regarding various issues which they consider as discriminatory. For example the treatment of expatriate workers, the review of Remuneration Orders of a five-yearly basis, the consideration of all categories of workers equally in sectors such as health and education and other issues pertaining to the law and the public broadcasting service amongst others.
The Attorney General Rama Valayden and Minister Chaumière said these proposals would meet due consideration. Minister Chaumière explained the importance of having all socio-economic stakeholders on board in view of this national endeavour of harmonizing laws to eliminate discrimination. The trade unions were requested to submit their views and comments to the Committee for circulation to other stakeholders. A second meeting with trade unions will take place in a month’s time.
The Committee will be meeting stakeholders in Rodrigues for the next round of consultations.
SPEECH OF MINISTER CHAUMIERE AT THE PROSAFE FIRE FIGHTING WORKSHOP
It gives me much pleasure and honour to be in your midst this morning on the occasion of the opening ceremony of this workshop on fire fighting equipment organised by Prosafe Marketing Ltd.
Ladies and gentlemen, the workplace environment has seen considerable changes over the last decades with the introduction of new technologies, new equipment, new production methods and new work patterns. In view of the increasing complexity of health and safety risks, the interest of our workforce which remains our most valuable assets, has to be safeguarded, the more so, as we have to be competitive, in this era of globalisation.
Production, quality and safety should all go hand in hand and health and safety management should form an integral part in the day-to-day management function, as accidents can ruin businesses; bring about disrepute to the company’s image apart from other commonly known direct costs associated with them thereby affecting the productivity and competitiveness of enterprises.
We cannot therefore, ignore the magnitude of the impact of occupational accidents and diseases in terms of human suffering and related economic costs. There is no price for human life, and a safe and healthy working environment forms part of the fundamental rights of an employee. In line with the Government programme 2005–2010, the Occupational Safety and Health Legislation has been reviewed and now aims at meeting the new challenges at places of work and providing a safe and healthy workplace for one and all.
This piece of modern legislation addresses several issues. It is wider in scope and covers all employees, be it in the public or private sectors and introduces a number of new and innovative concepts such as safety and health policy and risk assessment.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 clearly spells out the responsibility of the employer to provide his employees, who can suffer bodily injuries, which cannot be prevented by other means, with such suitable and appropriate personal protective equipment and clothing which will protect him from risk of injury. The employer should in the first instance, adopt appropriate engineering control measures to eliminate or control risks.
The employer should also take into consideration ergonomic factors and the element of fit to the wearer of personal protective equipment when issuing same. As regards fire fighting protective equipment this should be given even more consideration as fire fighters are called upon to save life and properties, and if they are not issued with the right type and standard of fire-fighting protective equipment, this may expose them to life-threatening risks which are clearly unacceptable in any event.
Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to seize this opportunity to emphasise the fact that every employer should ensure the safety, health and welfare at work of his employees by complying with their duties and responsibilities as spelt out in the Occupational Safety and Health Act which, amongst others, include:
· providing and maintaining a safe and healthy working environment and plants and systems of work,
· maintaining safe and healthy places of work,
· providing and maintaining adequate welfare facilities, and
· Providing information, instruction, training and supervision as is necessary to ensure the safety and health at work of the employees.
I would like to draw the attention of employers on the fact that they should ensure that employees are trained in the proper use and maintenance, where necessary, of the personal protective equipment provided to them so as to afford an efficient and effective protection to the employees while they are exposed to risks.
Ladies and gentlemen, employees also have a responsibility to cooperate with the employers for maintaining high standards of safety and health at the workplace. They should wear or use any personal protective clothing provided by the employer at all times when there is a risk of bodily injury against which the equipment or clothing afford protection.
Safety and health not only includes provision of a safe and healthy working environment but it also requires the right attitude and behaviour of employees regarding use of personal protective equipment. Changes in the behaviour of employees can only be brought about through the firm commitment of management to bring a new safety culture at the workplace through appropriate information and training campaign. Employees should report forthwith to their employer the loss or destruction of, or defect in the personal protective equipment or clothing affords protection. An employee should also report forthwith to his employer the loss or destruction of, or defects in, the protective equipment or clothing. Employees should know that any personal protective equipment provided to them is for the protection of their life and health and in not wearing the protective clothing and using the necessary equipment they are taking unnecessary risks.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am made to understand that Pro-safe Marketing Ltd started its operation in 1995. It is involved in the supply of personal protective equipment and the provision of training and consultancy services to diverse sectors of the economy including the agricultural, textile, public and airport sectors.
Your role in the enhancement of safety and health standards in Mauritius as supplier of personal protective equipment cannot be underestimated. I hope you will continue to play a key role in the improvement of safety and health standard in Mauritius by supplying high quality and reliable personal protective equipment to the Mauritian workforce.
Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to conclude here by wishing you plenty of success in your endeavour to promote health and safety at your level. As you are aware, safety and health concerns each and everyone in the society at large be it employers, employees, importers or suppliers and each stakeholder should assume his responsibilities in ensuring high standards of safety and health at all workplaces.
SPEECH OF HON. JEAN FRANCOIS CHAUMIERE AT THE GOVERNMENT ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION AGM
It gives me great pleasure to be among you this afternoon on the occasion of the AGM and half-day sensitization programme organised by the Government Professional Engineers’ Association.
I am informed that the Government Professional Engineers’ Association groups engineers from several Ministries, and that, this afternoon, in addition to its AGM, your association has sought it important to conduct a sensitization programme for your members on the provisions of the Employment Relations Act which is effective as from February last year. This initiative is in line with what I am always saying with regards to this new labour legislation: that all stakeholders, including the trade unions and other professional associations, must make it their responsibility to inform their members of the main provisions of the new labour laws, as well as of other legal instruments relating to the world of work.
As professionals and also as members of a union, you should also be aware that, in addition to reforms in our labour legislation, the government has also initiated a series of economic, social and institutional reforms with the overall aim of improving the quality of life of every citizen in this country. Many of these reforms that have challenged the comfort of traditional and outdated practices and expectations, have now revealed themselves as being necessary and instrumental in order to better respond to the on-going challenges.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Most of the economic and social indicators have shown that the government was always right in coming up with enabling and bold measures in time through successive budgets since we took office in 2005. We have been able not only to address the serious and catastrophic economic situation we had inherited, but we have also been able to mitigate the impact of the world economic and financial crisis with some success.
Today, the whole of the Island has become a construction site – thanks to the numerous and countless projects this government has initiated with regards to public infrastructure, government buildings, roads – without mentioning such massive projects like the new airport terminals, Jing Fe, in addition to the development in the tourism and IRS sectors, etc…
The Government of Mauritius needs and employs different kinds of Engineers including civil, environmental, mechanical, electrical, chemical, agriculture and computer engineers. I am sure that all Engineers here have noted the concern of our Honorable Prime Minister Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam last year in relation to the scarcity of Engineers in the country and where friendly countries like India was reluctant to release their Engineers because they themselves were in need. If we speak of scarcity of engineers in Mauritius, it must be related to the unprecedented boom in the construction and infrastructural sectors thanks to the measures taken by this government.
It is generally known that Engineers have primarily been the spearhead to develop ways to utilize economically the materials and forces of nature for the benefit of mankind. On the one hand the invention of new manufacturing-processes has allowed economic output at the lowest possible cost and on the other hand, it has contributed to render work more human. Furthermore, there have been considerable improvements in other spheres through new technologies which have rendered our life more comfortable.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Engineers play a crucial role in creating infrastructure in the world. Engineers are problem solvers who apply their knowledge and experience to building projects that meet human needs, and to cleaning up environmental problems. Engineers design equipment and machines and ensure that safety norms and standards are incorporated therein. They work on a wide range of issues and projects, and as a result, Engineers’ work can have a significant impact on progress towards sustainable development.
I believe that Engineers in the Public Service need to be sensitized in a very important concept known as Decent Work, which sums up the aspirations of people in their working lives. It involves opportunities for work that is productive, freely chosen and delivers a fair income, security and safety in the workplace and social protection for the worker and his/her family, better prospects for personal development and social integration, freedom for people to express their concerns, organize and participate in the decisions that affect their lives and equality of opportunity and treatment for all women and men. The Decent Work Concept was, as you may all know, first expressed and formally mentioned by the International Labour Organisation Director-General, Juan Somavia, in his Report to the ILO in 1999.
At the level of my own Ministry, we have not only spearheaded the ratification of the Eight ILO Fundamental Conventions and but also ensured that all our Labour Laws are in compliance with these fundamental Conventions – which are of direct relevance to Decent Work principles.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Another fundamental issue that we have to address in the context of Decent Work agenda is Occupational Safety and Health. Engineers need not be reminded that the question of Occupational Safety and Health must always remain a priority in their day-to-day activities. Changes in society, work organization and production methods are leading to new types of occupational risks that demand new measures and solutions. The World of Work is changing rapidly and work-related health issues are changing too. It is under this background, that on 1st September 2007, a new Occupational Safety and Health Act came into effect. The primary objectives of this new legislation are to further strengthen and broaden the legal framework on safety, health and the welfare of employees at work – both in the private sector and the public sector as well. The provision of decent work at the workplace ranks high on the agenda of the Government, and of my Ministry in particular.
The government’s commitment and determination to reform the outdated industrial relations framework has been translated in the adoption of the Employment Relations Act and the Employment Rights Act – having as primary objectives to strengthen dialogue with Social Partners, to better protect workers and to promote effective Collective-Bargaining. One prominent feature of the Employment Relations Act is the effective recognition of the right to Collective-Bargaining which remains the Trade Unions most important function. This legislation sets out the conditions for harmonious development of Collective-Bargaining and for a conflict-free workplace. Barriers to good faith Collective-Bargaining such as union access to the workplace, access to information, recognition and time-off facilities have been addressed in the Employment Relations Act. Other provisions deal specifically with the responsibility of management as well as with such issues as Procedural Agreements in order to facilitate effective Collective Bargaining. Several other provisions deal extensively with trade unions and workers rights as well.
As I have said earlier, it is up to the trade unions to ensure that they have a good grasp not only of all the provisions of the Employment Relations Act, but also of the role and functions of the numerous tripartite structures that have already been set-up – such as the Commission for Conciliation and Mediation, Employment Relations Tribunal, amongst others.
I must say that I fully agree with the main objectives of the Government Professional Engineers’ Association, which are to promote social dialogue and sound relations and to resort to conciliatory methods to settle disputes between members and their employers and between members and other workers.
I fully subscribe to this method of resolving industrial dispute as it allows the parties involved to meet, sort out misunderstandings, explore options and arrive at a mutually beneficial solution. Consequently, those involved in the process of resolving their differences through Conciliation and Mediation are far more likely to strengthen their relations for mutual benefits. I also wish to assure you of my unconditional support in the process of resolving any industrial dispute.
By way of conclusion, and coming back to your role as engineers – let me say that you have, no doubt, contributed immensely in improving the quality of life of our population. I need not elaborate on the many accomplishments and achievements that can be attributed to engineers. However, I believe that, irrespective of the fields you cater for, as engineers, your concern should also focus on such issues pertaining to sustainable development and to such project as Maurice-Ile- Durable. In this regard, you must consider yourselves as privileged partners in addressing the objectives of the government on these issues. You, as engineers must play a decisive role not only in the promotion but also in contributing to make the concept Maurice-Ile- Durable a reality.
I again take the opportunity to congratulate the Association for their initiative and wish its members my best wishes in their endeavor.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
MINISTER CHAUMIERE MEETS DR. EMMANUEL OTAALA, MINISTER OF STATE FOR LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS OF UGANDA
The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, Hon. Jean-François Chaumière met with Ugandan State Minister for Labour, Employment and Industrial Relations Dr. Emmanuel O. Otaala today at his office in Port Louis. Dr. Otaala, who arrived in Mauritius yesterday for a 3-day official visit, is accompanied by Ms. Harriet Luyima, Acting Commissioner for Employment Services and Mr. Milton Turyasiima, Senior Labour Officer of the Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development of Uganda.
The aim of the visit, according to Minister Otaala is to learn how Mauritius,as a country, has made it to middle-income status. The delegation is also here to learn about creating jobs and opportunities, the new labour legislation, trade unionism in Mauritius and the tripartite structures which exist here.
The meeting between Minister Chaumière and Dr. Otaala was an occasion to compare notes on the development of labour, industrial relations and employment in both countries. “It is an opportunity for us also to learn from you” Minister Chaumière told his Ugandan counterpart. Discussions centered on the Employment Relations and Employment Rights Acts, the resilience of employment in Mauritius in the face of the world economic downturn, circular migration and the various strategies put in place by government to fuel job creation. From Dr. Otaala, Minister Chaumière learnt of the existence of high number of IT technicians coming out of Uganda training schools each year, which could be of interest to Mauritius to meet the demand in this field.
During their visit, the delegation from Uganda will be meeting officers from the Labour and Industrial Relations and from the Employment divisions of the Ministry. Meetings are also to be held with the Ministry of Finance and Economic Empowerment, the National Remuneration Board, the Mauritius Employers’ Federation and the Mauritius Trade Unions Organisation.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
MINISTERIAL COMMITTEE ON ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION IN MAURTITIAN LAWS MEETS PRIVATE SECTOR
The 3rd round of consultations on the Elimination of Discrimination in Mauritian Laws took place today at the Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment. This meeting was chaired by the Attorney General Rama Valayden, in presence of Minister Jean-François Chaumière and representatives of private organizations such as the MEF, the JEC, MEXA, AHRIM, BACECA and the MSPA.
The Attorney General explained the purpose of the consultation, which is to make the private sector aware of what is being undertaken by government in view of harmonizing existing laws so as to make them more gender-neutral. Minister Chaumière explained that it was a national process which requires the input of all stakeholders.
Input
This initiative of meeting the private sector was welcomed by all present. Raj Makoond from the JEC explained that it was important to apply a sensitization strategy so as to bring about the desired change of mindset with respect to gender issues. Jean Li from the MSPA for his part gave examples of his organization's endeavours to integrate the notion of ‘equal work equal pay’. Mr. Pellegrin from the Insurers' Association suggested a working group was set up to make recommendations to the Ministerial committee, while Mrs. Danielle Wong from MEXA spoke of the need to ensure gender-neutrality leads to job creation.
The way forward
Jean-François Chaumière reminded that it’s a matter of human dignity and equal opportunity that the harmonization process in view of eliminating discrimination in laws be carried out successfully. Therefore, he said, an extensive educational action would have to be carried out at all levels to achieve the desired mentality and paradigm shift. Rama Valayden for his part stated the Committee would meet the private sector in a month to take cognizance of their proposals.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
INCRIMINATED OFFICER OF CONSOLIDATED DYEING AND FABRICS LTD. TO BE PROSECUTED UNDER SECTION 31 OF THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ACT.
In the case concerning the incrimination of a cadre of Consolidated Dyeing & Fabrics Ltd. by an employee of this company, and pertaining to alleged threats on the part of the cadre to the employee so that the latter withdraws from his trade union, the Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment is conferring with the State Law Office over the prosecution of the incriminated cadre.
Minster Jean-François Chaumière has taken the decision to prosecute under Section 31 of the Employment Relations Act as follows :
31. Protection against discrimination and victimisation
(1) No person shall –
(a) require another person –
(i) seeking employment not to join a trade union of his own choice;
(ii) to give up membership of a trade union.
Minster Jean-François Chaumière has taken the decision to prosecute under Section 31 of the Employment Relations Act as follows :
31. Protection against discrimination and victimisation
(1) No person shall –
(a) require another person –
(i) seeking employment not to join a trade union of his own choice;
(ii) to give up membership of a trade union.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
GOVERNMENT STRIVES TO ELIMINATE DISCRIMINATION IN EXISTING MAURITIAN LAWS
The Ministerial Committee in Charge of the harmonization study in view of eliminating all forms of discrimination in the existing Mauritian laws gathered today the Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment. The committee is chaired by the Attorney General Rama Valayden, and includes MinisterS Jean-François Chaumière, Rajesh Jeetah and Indira Seeburn who was represented by officials of her ministry at today’s session. Permanent secretaries and high cadres of several government departments and ministries, including the State Law Office, also attended the meeting.
Speaking to the press after the meeting, the Attorney General and Ministers Chaumiere and Jeetah explained that the various ministries are expected to submit all their findings on discrimination by next week, after which these will be circulated to all stakeholders for about a month. The amendments will then be brought to parliament gradually. It was also decided that the private sector should be taken on board in this process of eliminating discrimination
Backgrounder
The study was undertaken under the UNDP funded country project ‘Capacity Building for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women’ and was entrusted to a team of three consultants namely Professor V.P.Torul as team leader, Ms. G. Topsee-Sonoo and Ms O. Lim Tung. It aimed at identifying discriminatory statutes and provisions in the existing national legislation using the ILO Convention No. 111 on Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) – C111-, adopted in 1958, as benchmark. It has also taken into account other international instruments advocating equality of opportunity and non-discrimination such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The outcome of the study is meant to form part of the integral process of domesticating C111, ratified by Mauritius in 2002.
2. The research started in May 2006 and was completed in August 2007. It took into account national legislation in force as at 31 July 2007. The report was released to stakeholders in September 2008 for consideration of implementation of the recommendations. In essence, the report reveals the following:
(i) The Constitution of Mauritius makes provisions against all forms of discrimination specified in C111, CEDAW and CERD.
(ii) On the basis of Section 16(1) of the Constitution, which outlaws any discrimination based on sex, specific provisions of some legislation that are still discriminatory against women are therefore unconstitutional.
(iii) The Labour Act and Section 20 of the Industrial Expansion Act make specific distinctions between male and female workers as regards prescribed hours of work.
(iv) As far as Remuneration Orders (R.Os) are concerned, discriminatory features identified mainly relate to:
- job appellations with gender connotation;
- criteria for entitlement to transport benefits;
- restrictions on women to perform certain jobs and operations particularly in the agricultural sector, entailing a difference in wages and other allowances earned by male and female workers;
- different voluntary retirement age prescribed for men and women in certain sectors;
- different sets of privileges and benefits in relation to maternity.
(v) The National Pensions Act contains sex-based discriminatory provisions such as:
- at Section 4(1) of the Act, mention is made only of widow’s pension;
- in certain instances, allowances provided for in the Act are applicable to male beneficiaries only.
(vi) In the Criminal Code, Section 242 is considered discriminatory inasmuch as it gives the husband a defence in cases of manslaughter committed in the face of adultery.
(vii) The Mauritian Civil Code has also been found to contain discriminatory provisions, inter alia, with respect to:
- the transmission of patronymic name to children;
- wordings with gender connotation in various Articles.
(viii) Discriminatory provisions observed in other pieces of legislation are generally linked to the age factor, eligibility for various types of pensions and access to legal aid among others.
3. The report consists of two parts - Part I, concerning discrimination in the Mauritian body of law relating to Convention No. 111 and to additional grounds identified by the ILO as emerging prohibited grounds of discrimination following a general survey carried out in 1996; and Part II, concerning discrimination relating to other international instruments such as the CEDAW, CERD and ICCPR. Appendices I and II give a summary of the findings and recommendations found, respectively, at Part I and II of the report.
Speaking to the press after the meeting, the Attorney General and Ministers Chaumiere and Jeetah explained that the various ministries are expected to submit all their findings on discrimination by next week, after which these will be circulated to all stakeholders for about a month. The amendments will then be brought to parliament gradually. It was also decided that the private sector should be taken on board in this process of eliminating discrimination
Backgrounder
The study was undertaken under the UNDP funded country project ‘Capacity Building for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women’ and was entrusted to a team of three consultants namely Professor V.P.Torul as team leader, Ms. G. Topsee-Sonoo and Ms O. Lim Tung. It aimed at identifying discriminatory statutes and provisions in the existing national legislation using the ILO Convention No. 111 on Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) – C111-, adopted in 1958, as benchmark. It has also taken into account other international instruments advocating equality of opportunity and non-discrimination such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The outcome of the study is meant to form part of the integral process of domesticating C111, ratified by Mauritius in 2002.
2. The research started in May 2006 and was completed in August 2007. It took into account national legislation in force as at 31 July 2007. The report was released to stakeholders in September 2008 for consideration of implementation of the recommendations. In essence, the report reveals the following:
(i) The Constitution of Mauritius makes provisions against all forms of discrimination specified in C111, CEDAW and CERD.
(ii) On the basis of Section 16(1) of the Constitution, which outlaws any discrimination based on sex, specific provisions of some legislation that are still discriminatory against women are therefore unconstitutional.
(iii) The Labour Act and Section 20 of the Industrial Expansion Act make specific distinctions between male and female workers as regards prescribed hours of work.
(iv) As far as Remuneration Orders (R.Os) are concerned, discriminatory features identified mainly relate to:
- job appellations with gender connotation;
- criteria for entitlement to transport benefits;
- restrictions on women to perform certain jobs and operations particularly in the agricultural sector, entailing a difference in wages and other allowances earned by male and female workers;
- different voluntary retirement age prescribed for men and women in certain sectors;
- different sets of privileges and benefits in relation to maternity.
(v) The National Pensions Act contains sex-based discriminatory provisions such as:
- at Section 4(1) of the Act, mention is made only of widow’s pension;
- in certain instances, allowances provided for in the Act are applicable to male beneficiaries only.
(vi) In the Criminal Code, Section 242 is considered discriminatory inasmuch as it gives the husband a defence in cases of manslaughter committed in the face of adultery.
(vii) The Mauritian Civil Code has also been found to contain discriminatory provisions, inter alia, with respect to:
- the transmission of patronymic name to children;
- wordings with gender connotation in various Articles.
(viii) Discriminatory provisions observed in other pieces of legislation are generally linked to the age factor, eligibility for various types of pensions and access to legal aid among others.
3. The report consists of two parts - Part I, concerning discrimination in the Mauritian body of law relating to Convention No. 111 and to additional grounds identified by the ILO as emerging prohibited grounds of discrimination following a general survey carried out in 1996; and Part II, concerning discrimination relating to other international instruments such as the CEDAW, CERD and ICCPR. Appendices I and II give a summary of the findings and recommendations found, respectively, at Part I and II of the report.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
MANPOWER FROM RODRIGUES SOUGHT FOR MAINLAND MAURITIAN INDUSTRIES
The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, Hon. Jean-François Chaumière held a meeting today in presence of the Chief Commissioner of Rodrigues Johnson Roussety, the Rodrigues Commissioner for Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment Mr. Christian Agathe, officials of the Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, and the representative of BACECA – the Building and Civil Engineering Contractors Association, Mr. Bushan Ramloll.
The focus of the meeting was the pool of manpower that can be created in Rodrigues to address the shortage of workers in specific industries on mainland Mauritius, such as construction industries. About 3 900 jobs have been created in this sector lately, and Rodriguans should be able to benefit from this boom, Minister Chaumière underlined.
It was also discussed how the contract of the workers coming from Rodrigues could be drawn so as to be more adapted to the needs of these workers, and the contractors wishing to employ them. It was discussed, for example, that their contracts should specify accommodation and transport conditions as well as whether these contracts should be period or project-based.
Minister Chaumière and Chief Commissioner Johnson Roussety agreed on the principle of training people from Rodrigues for the requirements of specific industries and occupations in Mauritius. Chief Commissioner Roussety and Commissioner should begin working on a scheme in Rodrigues to publicize the needs of the Mauritian labour market, and to explain to workers there what is expected of them should they join the mainland workforce.
The focus of the meeting was the pool of manpower that can be created in Rodrigues to address the shortage of workers in specific industries on mainland Mauritius, such as construction industries. About 3 900 jobs have been created in this sector lately, and Rodriguans should be able to benefit from this boom, Minister Chaumière underlined.
It was also discussed how the contract of the workers coming from Rodrigues could be drawn so as to be more adapted to the needs of these workers, and the contractors wishing to employ them. It was discussed, for example, that their contracts should specify accommodation and transport conditions as well as whether these contracts should be period or project-based.
Minister Chaumière and Chief Commissioner Johnson Roussety agreed on the principle of training people from Rodrigues for the requirements of specific industries and occupations in Mauritius. Chief Commissioner Roussety and Commissioner should begin working on a scheme in Rodrigues to publicize the needs of the Mauritian labour market, and to explain to workers there what is expected of them should they join the mainland workforce.
REGULATIONS TO BE AMENDED FOR STATUTORY BODIES TO BE ABLE TO EXTEND THE RETIREMENT AGE TO 65
The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, Hon. Jean-François Chaumière held a tripartite meeting today with representatives of workers of Mauritius Post – the FCSOU – and the management of Mauritius Post, following representations from the FCSOU regarding the extension of the retirement age to 65 for this company.
For reminder, the Government, under the Finance Act 2008, provided for the gradual extension of the retirement age from 60 to 65. This provision did not include non PRB-governed officers, that is: those from Statutory Bodies. Hence, the representation from the FCSOU for its members employed at the Mauritius Post Limited, which under Section 71 of the Employment Rights Act can negotiate for the retirement age to be extended to 65.
Minister Chaumière has therefore apprised the stakeholders of the Government’s decision for the regulations regarding the retirement age for Statutory Bodies to be amended at the level of the State Law Office so that these institutions may comply with the general government policy of retirement age at 65.
This meeting was held in presence of the Director of Labour and Industrial Relations of the Ministry, representatives of the management of Mauritius Post Limited, the FCSOU, representatives of the Ministry of Finance and of SICOM – which is in charge of pensions for all 105 Statutory Bodies.
For reminder, the Government, under the Finance Act 2008, provided for the gradual extension of the retirement age from 60 to 65. This provision did not include non PRB-governed officers, that is: those from Statutory Bodies. Hence, the representation from the FCSOU for its members employed at the Mauritius Post Limited, which under Section 71 of the Employment Rights Act can negotiate for the retirement age to be extended to 65.
Minister Chaumière has therefore apprised the stakeholders of the Government’s decision for the regulations regarding the retirement age for Statutory Bodies to be amended at the level of the State Law Office so that these institutions may comply with the general government policy of retirement age at 65.
This meeting was held in presence of the Director of Labour and Industrial Relations of the Ministry, representatives of the management of Mauritius Post Limited, the FCSOU, representatives of the Ministry of Finance and of SICOM – which is in charge of pensions for all 105 Statutory Bodies.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
1 MILLION US DOLLARS COLLECTED BY MAURITIUS FOR HAITI
The Teledon Solidarité Haiti, an initiative of the Prime Minister, Dr. Navin Ramgoolam launched only 3 days after the disastrous earthquake which struck Haiti on the 12th of January this year, has yielded Rs 15 300 900 as at this morning (Tuesday, 23 February 2010). This figure is expected to rise as new donations will be considered at the close of the Teledon Solidarité Haiti accounts today at 12 p.m.
Minister Jean-François Chaumière, president of the ministerial committee in charge of the Teledon, announced the closing of accounts today at London College of Port Louis. The college, for reminder, was the first institution to make their donation of Rs 105 000 at the launch of the event on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 at the Municipality of Port Louis. Minister Chaumière praised the school as an example-setter not only for the youth, but for the entire country. Indeed, 82-year old Goolam Mohammed Dulloon, President of one of the island’s oldest associations – the Mauritius Muslim Brotherhood – set up 50 years ago, handed Minister Chaumière a cheque of Rs 70 000, collected by his organization for the victims of Haiti.
The Lord Mayor of Port Louis, Sheik Muktar Hossenbacus, Minister Asraf Dulull and the Attorney General Rama Valayden were also present at London College this morning. They all highlighted solidarity as having become inherent of Mauritian life as demonstrated through the Teledon endeavour. Mr. Harold Chan Lam, Founder and Manager of London College, for his part reminded students and those present of the school's tradition of charitable initiative.
The final figure for the Teledon, added to the donation made by the Government of the Republic of Mauritius is expected to amount to
1 000 000 US dollars.
Labels:
MINISTERIAL ACTIVITIES,
PRESS RELEASES
Thursday, February 18, 2010
MINISTER CHAUMIERE APPEALS TO UNITY OF MAURITIAN TRADE UNIONS
The The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment Honourable Jean-François Chaumière inaugurated a seminar today, organized by the ILO’s Bureau for Workers’ Activities (ACTRAV), in collaboration with ITUC-Africa (International Trade Union Confederation Africa) the NTUC, the MTUC and the MLC. The objective of the seminar is to reduce the multiplicity of trade unions in Mauritius and foment unity in this movement.
In his address, Minister Chaumière presented disturbing statistics regarding trade unionism in Mauritius. He said: “a total of only 102,901 workers are organised in as many as 338 Trade Unions in a total active labour force of some 544,800 – which means about 18% unionised workers – a reasonable rate as compared to many countries. While the rate of unionisation in the Public Sector is about 54%, it is shocking to learn that only 11% of workers in the Private Sector are unionised. However, what is more astounding is the number of unions representing such a small workforce. 338 trade unions, out of which we have as many as 76 unions to-date with less than 30 members – far below the membership requirement for a trade union to continue to exist under the Employment Relations Act.” The Minister spoke of the need to unify these movements for the benefit of the Mauritian workforce.
In his address, Mr. Dan Cunniah, the ILO-ACTRAV director explained his bureau’s endeavour to help the revamping of the Mauritian trade union movement. He underlined the issues of multiplicity and state subsidies as ones that much needed to be addressed. He also expressed support for state initiatives regarding the Decent Work Country Programme and the Trade Union Trust Fund.
The presidents of the confederations represented at this seminar also stated their will to strengthen trade unionism in our country, expressing concern however about the current ageing trend in the movement.
SPEECH - ILO/ACTRAV SEMINAR
I wish to thank Mr. Dan Cunniah, Director of ACTRAV, ILO, for inviting me to address this gathering on the occasion of the opening of this 2-day workshop being organised by the ILO in collaboration with the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), and major trade union organisations in this country.
I would like, at the very outset, to express my appreciation to the ILO for taking the initiative to organise this important workshop on ‘Trade Union Unity’. This activity has indeed come at an opportune time when Trade Unions across the world are struggling to come to terms with the challenges of globalisation, and with the challenges of change to which we are all being continuously confronted.
Today, we are at the crossroad of our development, and more than ever before, we need the understanding and the support of all stakeholders, and above all, of the trade union organisations in our country.
Never before, has there been such relentless social, economic and technological change. The changing world economic and social order, the process of globalisation and the drastic emergence of new technologies and international economic and financial crisis have certainly an impact on our social and economic structures and systems that necessitate a complete transformation and overhauling.
Under this economic and social background not only the government, but also many institutions and organisations have been compelled to review their strategies, and to initiate a number of reforms. We too, at government level, we have initiated, in addition to economic, social and institutional reforms, reforms in our labour legislation. Many of these reforms that have challenged the comfort of traditional and outdated practices and expectations, have revealed themselves as being necessary and instrumental in order to better respond to the on-going challenges.
Employers associations, too, under the umbrella of only one federation, namely the Mauritius Employers’ Federation, have not hesitated to take such actions that were necessary in order to adapt to these changing business and working environment.
We must be aware that today, employers associations, in addition to further expanding their activities and services to their members, have also managed to assert themselves as powerful and effective organisations who are able to better protect and defend the interest of their members in their respective sectors.
Now, what is the situation regarding Trade Unions in Mauritius? Are they as strong and as effective as Employers associations in advancing and defending the interest of their membership?
Dear friends, before I give you the facts and figures, allow me to say that trade unions have played and will continue to play an important and crucial role in the socio-economic development of our country. However, the economic and social changes that are unfolding before you, must compel you as well to do some re-thinking regarding the new roles and objectives of Trade Unions. If Trade Unions can legitimately comment on, and quite often, question economic and social reforms and measures, they have also the duty to think of their own reforms, and identify ways and means that will enable them to better adapt to this new environment.
We live in an era of dynamic labour markets, in which employment relations have become vital for the promotion of social justice and economic development. Over the past 35 years, the concept of work and employment relations have undergone far reaching transformations in Mauritius with the advent of new technologies, emergence of new sectors like ICT, Finance and Service Sectors, the widening of the informal sector, influx of labour migration, increased participation of women in the labour market and the adoption of flexible market policies.
In this changing context, trade unions all over the world have been experiencing decreased membership and have to cope with a more diversified workforce, more complex issues and broader societal concerns. In order to ensure their very survival, many trade union organisations, at individual to national and international levels, have taken some interesting initiatives. Let me mention just a few examples:-
In Germany, several Trade Union Organisations operating in various sectors took the decision in 2001 to merge into one single Trade Union Organisation, known today as VERDI – making it as one of the largest independent and individual Trade Union in the world with over 2.3 million members. This union has a dense and widespread network of offices across Germany and employs thousands of trained and experienced officials, notwithstanding its increased financial capacity that enables members on strike to receive financial support.
Most of you present today must be aware of the historical merger, in November 1, 2006, of the ICFTU and WCL, resulting in the creation of the World’s largest International Trade Union Organisation, namely the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) – to which several Trade Union Organisations in Mauritius are affiliated.
Many other Trade Unions, International Trade Union Secretariats (ITS), as well as regional organisations have followed suit, and have responded by initiating mergers and amalgamations with a view to further strengthening their respective organisations. I understand that the ITUC affiliates in Mauritius, and in other countries, have also been advised to take such steps so as to unite their organisations in line with the founding principles of the ITUC.
It is unfortunate, however, that the labour movement in our small island is characterised by a multiplicity of organisations, so much so that one is left wondering whether Mauritius should be included in the Guinness Book of Records for the number of unions we have for a country with about 1.2 million people.
My dear friends, a membership breakdown from the returns of trade unions provided by the Registrar of Associations shows the following:-
A total of only 102,901 workers are organised in as many as 338 Trade Unions in a total active labour force of some 544,800 – which means about 18% unionised workers – a reasonable rate as compared to many countries. While the rate of unionisation in the Public Sector is about 54%, it is shocking to learn that only 11% of workers in the Private Sector are unionised. However, what is more astounding is the number of unions representing such a small workforce. 338 trade unions, out of which we have as many as 76 unions to-date with less than 30 members – far below the membership requirement for a trade union to continue to exist under the Employment Relations Act. This means that these unions have until February next year to ensure they are in compliance with the requirements by taking relevant actions. Otherwise, they will be simply scrapped off the official list of trade unions by the Registrar of Associations. It should be noted that under the previous law, namely the IRA, only 7 workers were needed to form a trade union.
We have about 175 unions having less than 100 members, and another 100 unions having between 100 to 500 workers. Only 27 unions have between 500 to 1000 members, while another 22 represent between 1000 to 5000 members. Interestingly there are more than 50 unions in the education sector alone.
In 1997, a Trade Union Trust Fund (TUTF) was set up by government having as primary objectives: the promotion of workers’ education and of providing financial assistance to trade union organisations. Notwithstanding the activities of the TUTF organised so far, it remains, however, an irony that since the inception of the TUTF, the number of Trade Union Federations, instead of declining, have further increased from 10 to 23. Some of these organisations have had their membership dwindled substantially, while others have managed to increase their membership.
The present breakdown reveals that there are 4 bona-fide Confederations under the present legislation, and 19 Federations. These 4 confederations registered under the ERA are namely: The National Trade Union Confederation (NTUC), Confédération Syndicale de Gauche-Solidarité (CSGS), Confederation of Independent Trade Unions (CITU) and Confederation des Travailleurs du Secteur Privé (CTSP). As regards the Mauritius Trade Union Congress and Mauritius Labour Congress, they have lost their status as confederations. Under the Employment Relations Act, they are now registered as Federations. It should also be noted that the Registrar of Associations is actually processing an application for the registration of a new confederation of trade unions.
In addition to the problems of trade union proliferation, the Trade Union movement has also to confront its short comings in terms of Capacity-Building. With the exception of a few, many trade union organisations do not have a proper office. They have inadequate finance, a lack of trained and effective officers and negotiators. All these most certainly have an impact on the quality of services provided by these organisations to their members. Other factors that have compromised the strength of unions are inter-union rivalry, the inability to penetrate new emerging sectors of the economy, amongst others.
Dear friends, having apprised you of the trade union situation in the country, what should be the way-forward, now? Trade Unions need to re-establish their credentials as partners in development. You should realise that the mauritian society is undergoing a complete transformation and mutation due to globalisation. In order to better respond to these changes and challenges, trade unions should re-invent themselves, review their methods and strategies, and invest more with respect to Capacity-Building.
It also implies moving into new terrain, identifying new constituents, addressing the needs of new target groups and developing new structures. In particular, trade unions need to stretch their arms not only towards the youths, but also towards those who are excluded from traditional forms of work – the unskilled, those in the informal sector, the migrants, etc…
It is imperative that trade unions should also focus their activities on the youths. The youths and young workers are indeed the future of the trade union movement. Dealing with young people’s concerns and expectations, informing them of their rights and responsibilities, amongst others, and achieving thus their full integration in trade unions is crucial to the strengthening, revitalisation, creativity and future of the trade union movement. As regards Trade Union Finance, one cannot say that the mauritian trade union movement does not have enough financial resources. If we multiply 102,900 by an average per-head monthly contribution of Rs15.00 only, we come at an impressive amount of not less than Rs18.5 million per year – but unfortunately scattered in 338 unions. This amount is much more than the budget of some para-statal organisations in the country. Just imagine what the unions could have achieved, had these financial resources been pooled together.
The future of trade unions also depends on their adaptability and improvement in their functioning. Their future depends on their ability to develop healthy relations with employers and the government by re-designing their objectives roles and strategies. I sincerely believe that trade unions and management can always find some common ground on which to build solutions and develop constructive relationship.
Dear friends,
Since my appointment as Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations & Employment, I have ensured that social dialogue and tripartism be enhanced as fundamental approaches in the search for appropriate and lasting solutions to industrial relations problems. My personal interventions with regards to the cases involving trade unions against Air Mauritius, Bank of Mauritius, Mauritius Telecom, just to name a few, could be cited as examples.
My ministry has not only spearheaded the ratification of the Eight ILO Fundamental Conventions, but also ensured that the New Labour Laws, namely the Employment Relations Act and Employment Rights Act are in compliance with these fundamental conventions – which are of direct relevance to Decent Work Principles.
The government’s commitment and determination to reform the outdated industrial relations framework has been translated in the adoption of the Employment Relations Act and the Employment Rights Act – having as primary objectives to strengthen dialogue with Social Partners, to better protect workers and to promote effective Collective-Bargaining.
In fact, workers and trade unions have been given all the legal and institutional support and facilities through the new labour laws – much more than what were provided under the IRA and the Labour Act. It is a comprehensive and modern legislation where the focus is more on finding solutions to Industrial Relations problems.
One prominent feature of the Employment Relations Act is the effective recognition of the right to Collective-Bargaining which remains the Trade Unions most important function. This legislation sets out the conditions for harmonious development of Collective-Bargaining and for a conflict-free workplace. Barriers to good faith Collective-Bargaining such as union access to the workplace, access to information, recognition and time-off facilities have been addressed in the ERA. Other provisions deal specifically with the responsibility of management as well as with such issues as Procedural Agreements in order to facilitate effective Collective-Bargaining. Several other provisions deal extensively with trade unions and workers rights as well.
The Employment Relations Act, indeed, marks a major change in the mauritian statutory industrial relations system, which now also favours a more proactive and expeditious dispute resolution system, within a given time-frame, where the system is less technical and more accessible to parties, particularly to trade unions.
It is up to the trade unions to ensure that they have a good grasp not only of all the provisions of the labour laws, but also of the role and functions of the numerous tripartite structures that have already been set-up – such as the Employment Relations Tribunal, the Commission for Conciliation and Mediation, and the National Remuneration Board, amongst others.
It is also important that trade unions make the best use of their presence at the levels of such tripartite bodies like the Labour Advisory Council, Occupational Safety and Health Advisory Council. Mention must also be made of Boards of Para-Statals, Welfare and Pension Funds, without forgetting the National Economic and Social Council, just to name a few – where workers are represented.
Trade Unions, as well as management, must also ensure that workers are all properly sensitised on the important provisions of the new laws. Trade Unions must make necessary efforts to prepare their leaders on how to operate under the new legal framework. It is not an easy task, I understand, being given the number of unions in the country.
I have just laid out bare, for your own benefits, the trade union situation in the country. Notwithstanding all the weaknesses which the labour movement is confronted today, I must concede there are still a few very good trade union leaders of whom workers must be proud of. UNITY IS STRENGTH: There is no one better than trade unionists to understand the very implication of this saying. Mushrooming of trade unions have, for many years, undermined the Collective Bargaining power of workers. For many years, the blame was comfortably and conveniently put on the back of the Industrial Relations Act. You have now all the support and necessary protection that the new labour legislation provides to workers and to trade unions. It is up for the present leadership of trade unions to pave the way for a unified labour movement worth its name with a view to better protecting workers and improving their quality of life.
Before concluding, let me again express my heartfelt thanks to both
Mr. Dan Cunniah from the ILO, and Mr. Adu-Amankwah from ITUC (Africa) for their efforts to further strengthening the trade union movement in our country.
Monday, February 15, 2010
MINISTER CHAUMIERE MEETS ILO AND CSI-AFRICA REPRESENTATIVES
The Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, Hon. Jean-François Chaumière met a delegation led Mr. Dan Cunniah, Director of the Bureau for Workers’ Activities (ACTRAV) of the International Labour Organisation, who was accompanied by Mr. Kwasi ADU-AMANKWAH, Secretary General of CSI-Afrique (Confédération Syndicale Internationale) and Rawane MBAYE, Desk Officer for Africa at ACTRAV.
The discussions between Minister Chaumière and the delegation focused essentially on training in trade unions and workers’ education and the importance of social dialogue amongst others. Minister Chaumière expressed concern over various issues regarding trade unionism in Mauritius, particularly the low union membership rate in the private sector. Mr. Dan Cunniah for his part expressed his bureau’s interest in the National Tripartite Forum initiative of the Mauritian government.
The delegation is in Mauritius in view of a seminar to be held this coming Thursday on the trade union freedom and orientation in Mauritius. Minister Chaumière will be inaugurating this seminar.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
PROPOSALS FOR ATTORNEYS’ AND NOTARIES’ EMPLOYEES (R.O.) REGULATIONS
1.INTRODUCTION
On 7th August 2007, the Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, acting under Section 94(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1973 (IRA), referred to the National Remuneration Board (Board) the Attorneys’ and Notaries’ Employees (Remuneration Order) Regulations 1994 for an extensive review. The review exercise was initiated in January 2008. Public Hearings ended in October 2008. However following the reconstitution of the Board under the Employment Relations Act 2008 (ERA), acting under Section 108 (13), the Board proceeded as follows:
•Notice inviting interested parties to re‐submit written representations were published in the Government Gazette on 9 June 2009 and two daily newspapers, namely Le Mauricien and Le Socialiste, on 11 June 2009.
•The same parties responded as in the previous exercise:
‐The Mauritius Law Society (MLS), representing the attorneys;
‐A group of employees representing the interest of attorneys’ Clerks;
‐A group of employees representing the interest of notaries’ Clerks;
•The Board held one public hearing on 17 July 2009 whereby parties confirmed their earlier written and oral submissions and with general consent, proceedings held previously were made part of the present proceeding. Despite being contacted on several occasions, notaries neither submitted any written representations, nor were they represented at the hearing sessions. To make matters worse, despite reminders the Chamber of Notaries did not make the least move to provide the information sought by the Board for the purpose of this review exercise.
•On completion of public hearing, the Board undertook its own fact gathering exercise. However, out of fear, real or imaginary, there was a certain reluctance on the part of employees to
respond and submit required information. Despite given the assurance that all information will be treated with strict confidentiality, only 12 respondents dared to participate in the Board’s investigations. The Board would like to put on record the non‐collaborative attitude of the employers and their representatives during the Board’s survey.
2.OVERVIEW
Whereas the Notaries Act 2008 limits the number of notaries to a maximum of 100, there is no restriction as regards attorneys. As at November 2009, according to the records of the Supreme Court, there were 56 notaries and 138 attorneys as compared to 35 and 108 respectively in 1994, when the R.O. was last revised. Hardly 6 notaries and 3 attorneys employ more than 9 employees, providing employment to around 170 persons. Based on the figures of the Census of Economic Activities conducted in 2007, the attorneys and notaries employing less than 10 persons, employed around 728 workers of whom 6.6% were engaged on a part‐time basis. 57% of the full time employees were female workers. The average number of paid employees per unit stood at 3.5 for attorneys and 5.4 for notaries. It should however be noted that the present R.O. caters for only two categories of employees in this sector namely, Clerks and Typists while the messengers are covered by a separate R.O. of their own.
According to the Board’s observations 33.3% of employees are being remunerated above the minimum prescribed rates, 33.3% are drawing strictly the minimum rate and the rest are being under-remunerated. It is worth mentioning that in at least one case a clerk in his 8th year of service with his employer, while reckoning an overall 14 years’ experience in this field, is drawing 3% below the starting salary prescribed for a new entrant and therefore 16% less than the rate prescribed for an employee with 8 years service! This is a clear sign of bad faith on the part of the employer.
For complete proposals:
http://www.gov.mu/portal/goc/labour/file/att_not.pdf
On 7th August 2007, the Minister of Labour, Industrial Relations and Employment, acting under Section 94(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1973 (IRA), referred to the National Remuneration Board (Board) the Attorneys’ and Notaries’ Employees (Remuneration Order) Regulations 1994 for an extensive review. The review exercise was initiated in January 2008. Public Hearings ended in October 2008. However following the reconstitution of the Board under the Employment Relations Act 2008 (ERA), acting under Section 108 (13), the Board proceeded as follows:
•Notice inviting interested parties to re‐submit written representations were published in the Government Gazette on 9 June 2009 and two daily newspapers, namely Le Mauricien and Le Socialiste, on 11 June 2009.
•The same parties responded as in the previous exercise:
‐The Mauritius Law Society (MLS), representing the attorneys;
‐A group of employees representing the interest of attorneys’ Clerks;
‐A group of employees representing the interest of notaries’ Clerks;
•The Board held one public hearing on 17 July 2009 whereby parties confirmed their earlier written and oral submissions and with general consent, proceedings held previously were made part of the present proceeding. Despite being contacted on several occasions, notaries neither submitted any written representations, nor were they represented at the hearing sessions. To make matters worse, despite reminders the Chamber of Notaries did not make the least move to provide the information sought by the Board for the purpose of this review exercise.
•On completion of public hearing, the Board undertook its own fact gathering exercise. However, out of fear, real or imaginary, there was a certain reluctance on the part of employees to
respond and submit required information. Despite given the assurance that all information will be treated with strict confidentiality, only 12 respondents dared to participate in the Board’s investigations. The Board would like to put on record the non‐collaborative attitude of the employers and their representatives during the Board’s survey.
2.OVERVIEW
Whereas the Notaries Act 2008 limits the number of notaries to a maximum of 100, there is no restriction as regards attorneys. As at November 2009, according to the records of the Supreme Court, there were 56 notaries and 138 attorneys as compared to 35 and 108 respectively in 1994, when the R.O. was last revised. Hardly 6 notaries and 3 attorneys employ more than 9 employees, providing employment to around 170 persons. Based on the figures of the Census of Economic Activities conducted in 2007, the attorneys and notaries employing less than 10 persons, employed around 728 workers of whom 6.6% were engaged on a part‐time basis. 57% of the full time employees were female workers. The average number of paid employees per unit stood at 3.5 for attorneys and 5.4 for notaries. It should however be noted that the present R.O. caters for only two categories of employees in this sector namely, Clerks and Typists while the messengers are covered by a separate R.O. of their own.
According to the Board’s observations 33.3% of employees are being remunerated above the minimum prescribed rates, 33.3% are drawing strictly the minimum rate and the rest are being under-remunerated. It is worth mentioning that in at least one case a clerk in his 8th year of service with his employer, while reckoning an overall 14 years’ experience in this field, is drawing 3% below the starting salary prescribed for a new entrant and therefore 16% less than the rate prescribed for an employee with 8 years service! This is a clear sign of bad faith on the part of the employer.
For complete proposals:
http://www.gov.mu/portal/goc/labour/file/att_not.pdf
Friday, February 5, 2010
HAITI TELEDON EXTENDED TO 10TH FEBRUARY
The total donations for Haiti, through the national Teledon reached Rs 13, 873, 463 at noon today, Friday 05 February 2010.
At a press conference this afternoon, Minister Jean-François Chaumière annouced that the teledon would be extended till next Wednesday, 10 February, at the behest of the Prime Minister, Dr. Navin Ramgoolam. The teledon will have therefore lasted two weeks, after it was launch by the Prime Minister on the 27th of January. On that sole day, over Rs 8 million had been collected through donations in urns, through bank accounts and via sms.
Donations through banks are therefore acceptable until Wednesday, 10 February @ 12 p.m. (noon)
MCB: 017 114 535
SBM: 610 301 000 453 36
(Cheques payable to: GOVERNMENT OF MAURITIUS HAITI TELEDON)
SPEECH - LAUNCH OF MAURITIUS CIRCULAR MIGRATION DATABASE
It gives me great pleasure to be here today and to be associated with the launching of the Mauritius Circular Migration Database. This database comes at an opportune time as the Government is promoting circular migration as a strategy to achieve development benefits. Mauritius became a member of the International Organisation for Migration in 2006 and since then IOM has been assisting Mauritius in finding employment opportunities abroad for both Mauritian and Rodriguans interested to work abroad.
Ladies and gentlemen, you must have heard of the triple win scenario. Circular migration is indeed one of the areas where this triple win principle can be applied. With people going to work abroad, not only does the receiving country benefit from the labour and the skills of the worker, but the worker also wins in terms of experience and more interesting salary than in the home country. Moreover, the sending country benefits in terms of the skills acquired by the workers and the remittances of the latter which may be used either for the betterment of the standard of living of the family or for the setting up of enterprises in the home country.
Ladies and gentlemen, as you may be aware, my Ministry has been fully involved, together with the IOM, the Ministry of Finance and the NEF in the implementation of circular migration projects with Canada. Once IOM notified us of opportunities abroad, officers of my Ministry were responsible to prepare the press communiqué calling for applications, screen each and every application, shortlist the candidates, prepare the files for each candidate, carry the pre-selection interviews, make arrangements for medical examination and the final selection with the employers, among others. Officers of my Ministry were fully mobilized to handle such projects, which had to be treated with utmost urgency given the short delay in which the list of selected candidates had to be submitted to employers.
The process has worked very well so far and we have received very positive feedback from employers abroad. Now that we are aspiring to having even more collaboration from other countries and as a vigourous marketing of the Mauritian labour has been done in different international forums, we expect to have more offers in the near future. I am informed that there are indeed some new projects in the pipeline and the possibility of developing projects with other countries is being explored. We should therefore equip ourselves to be able to take advantage of these new opportunities.
We have to keep in mind that we are living in a very competitive world and any delay may cause us to lose interesting opportunities abroad. Mauritius is not the only country from where employers can find workers. More and more countries are opening up and providing training to their people to facilitate their placement in jobs abroad. Thus, it is in our interest that we make the best effort possible for Mauritius to keep its competitive advantage, which is its skilled, versatile, hard working and bilingual labour. Moreover, Mauritius should be seen on the international front as a country from where labour can be acquired within minimum time possible. The Philippines is one of the best examples where appropriate structures are in place to enable the smooth placement of people abroad, and where labour is readily available. We are very much inspired by the Philippines model and we are thus taking appropriate measures to have similar structures in place in Mauritius.
The MCMD therefore comes as a tool that will enable faster processing of overseas vacancies by alleviating and facilitating the whole selection process. The database will be a readily available pool of candidates from which the system will automatically generate the list of those registered candidates who meet the criteria of the employers. Not only will we save in terms of cost of advertisement, pre-selection, file creation, but also in terms of time. Such database exists in other countries and has been very helpful particularly in the context of circular migration.
My Ministry will continue to be involved in the circular migration projects by providing the services of its 13 Employment Information Centres around the island, where registration forms may be collected and returned. The EIC in Rodrigues has also been fully prepared for this exercise.
It is good to point out that there is also a number of private local recruitment agencies, duly licensed by my Ministry, to place Mauritians in employment abroad. In 2008, some 418 Mauritians were placed abroad through these agencies and in 2009 some 636 proceeded abroad with the assistance of these agencies. This shows the interest of our people to explore avenues and opportunities outside Mauritius.
Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to seize this opportunity to thank the IOM and its officers for the assistance provided to the Government of Mauritius, not only financial but also in terms of expertise, for the setting up of this database in Mauritius. In the light of interest shown by Mauritians to take up employment abroad, I am sure that the response of the public to the database would be very positive.
Moreover, I am confident that 2010 will be a fruitful year, full of opportunities for our people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)